12 Silos, One Dashboard, Zero Turf Wars
A Large Public University
At a Glance
Across this large public university, compliance reporting had evolved organically — which is another way of saying it had evolved into chaos. Each college, department, and administrative unit had developed its own intake process. Some used shared inboxes. Others used spreadsheets. A few had purchased standalone tools. The result was 12+ separate reporting silos, each invisible to the others.
For the central compliance office, this fragmentation was more than an inconvenience — it was a blind spot. Patterns that would be obvious in aggregate were invisible when data lived in a dozen disconnected systems. A trend of similar concerns across three different colleges looked like three isolated incidents instead of a systemic issue. Risk assessment was guesswork dressed up as strategy.
Ethico implemented a centralized intake using MyCM that funneled all reports through a single entry point, then immediately routed them back to the appropriate department for investigation and follow-up. The architecture was deliberately designed to give central leadership aggregate visibility while preserving each department's ownership of their cases from the moment of assignment forward.
The key design principle was "see everything, touch nothing." The central compliance office gained a unified dashboard showing reporting volumes, categories, response times, and trends across the entire campus. But the actual investigation work — the interviews, the findings, the resolutions — stayed with the departments that owned those relationships and understood the local context.
The unification was comprehensive: 12+ separate reporting silos collapsed into a single master database, giving leadership the campus-wide risk view they had lacked for years. For the first time, the compliance office could identify cross-departmental patterns, compare response times between units, and allocate resources based on data rather than politics.
Departmental autonomy remained fully intact. Each college continued to manage their own cases using their own judgment, with the added benefit of a standardized intake process that reduced the administrative overhead of receiving and logging reports. Several departments reported that the new system actually gave them more autonomy, not less — because standardized intake freed them from administrative tasks and let them focus on the investigative work they were best at.
Read the full case study
See exactly how this organization solved the challenge — enter your work email for instant access.
No spam. No sales calls. Just the case study.