They Thought the Data Was Broken: How Empathetic Intake Drove Anonymous Rates Below 20% in One Week
A National Mass-Market Retailer
At a Glance
Anonymous reports are a double-edged sword. They signal that people feel safe enough to say something, but not safe enough to say who they are. For this national mass-market retailer, the anonymous reporting rate had climbed so high that it was actively undermining the quality of investigations.
When a report comes in with no name, no contact information, and no way to follow up, investigators are working with one hand tied behind their backs. They cannot ask clarifying questions. They cannot gather additional context. They cannot notify the reporter of the outcome. The result is a growing pile of cases that are difficult to substantiate and impossible to close with confidence.
The retailer switched to Ethico's intake service, staffed by trained Risk Specialists who use empathetic elicitation techniques during every interaction. The difference from a standard intake process is fundamental: rather than simply recording what a reporter says and ending the call, Risk Specialists build rapport, establish trust, and create an environment where reporters feel comfortable enough to identify themselves voluntarily.
This is not about pressuring reporters to give up their anonymity. It is about demonstrating, in real time during the call, that their concerns are being taken seriously and that identifying themselves will lead to a better outcome -- for them and for the investigation. The approach is grounded in conversational techniques that make reporters feel heard, respected, and confident that the process will protect them.
The impact was so dramatic that the client initially thought something was wrong with the data. Within one week of go-live, the anonymous reporting rate dropped below 20%. The speed of the change was unprecedented -- not a gradual improvement over months, but a near-immediate transformation in reporter behavior.
With more identified reporters, the quality of investigations improved substantially. Investigators could follow up, ask clarifying questions, and keep reporters informed of progress. Cases that would have previously stalled due to lack of information could now be resolved thoroughly and defensibly.
Read the full case study
See exactly how this organization solved the challenge — enter your work email for instant access.
No spam. No sales calls. Just the case study.